ACCOUNTING
Auditing P 5-28
Part 2
Jackson is a sophisticated investor. As such, she was initially a member of a small group that was going to participate in a private placement of $1 million of common stock of Clarion Corporation. Numerouis meetings were held between management and the investor group. Detailed financial and other information was supplied to the participants. Upon the eve of completion of the placement, it was aborted when one major investor withdrew. Clarion than decided to offer $2.5 million of Clarion common stock to the purble pursuant to the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. Jackson subscribed to $300,000 of the Clarion public stock offering. Nin months later, Clarion’s earnings dropped significantly, and as a result, the stock dropped 20% beneath the offering price. In addition, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down 10% from the time of the offering.
Jackson sold her shares as a loss of $60,000 and seeks to hold all parties liable who participated in the public offering, including Clarion’s CPA firm of Allen, Dunn, and Rose. Although the audit was performed to conformity with auditing standards, there were some relatively minor misstatements. The financial statements of Clarion Corporation, which were part of the registration statement, contained minor misleading facts. It is believed by Clarion and Allen, Dunn, and Rose that Jackson’s asserted claim is without merit.
Required: Answer the following questions setting forth reasons for any conclusions stated.
a. If Jackson sues under the Securities Act of 1933, what will be the basis of her claim?
b. What are the probable defenses that might be asserted by Allen, Dunn, and Rose in light of these facts?
Click here for the SOLUTION
